LogoLogo
  • README
  • Contribute
    • Discuss on Github
  • Example
    • Banana-Powered Bitcoin Wallet Control Protocol
  • Apps
    • The deployment-info.json Specification
  • Wallet
    • Transaction Creation
    • Data Encryption and Decryption
    • Digital Signature Creation and Verification
    • Input Redemption
    • HTTP Wallet Communications Substrate
    • XDM Wallet Communications Substrate
    • Window Wallet Communication Substrate
    • Wallet Transaction Output Tracking (Output Baskets)
    • Submitting Received Payments to a Wallet
    • Certificate Creation and Revelation
    • Unified Abstract Wallet-to-Application Messaging Layer
    • Transaction Labels and List Actions
    • Output Basket Removal and Certificate Deletion
    • Group Permissions for App Access
    • Extensible Proof-Type Format for Specific Key Linkage Claims
    • P Protocols: Allowing future wallet protocol permission schemes
    • P Baskets: Allowing Future Wallet Basket and Digital Asset Permission Schemes
    • Unified, Vendor-Neutral, Unchanging, and Open BSV Blockchain Standard Wallet-to-Application Interface
  • Transactions
    • Everett-style Transaction Envelopes
    • Simplified Payment Verification
    • Merkle proof standardised format
    • TSC Proof Format with Heights
    • Raw Transaction Format
    • TXO Transaction Object Format
    • Transaction Extended Format (EF)
    • Merkle Path JSON format
    • Compound Merkle Path Format
    • Background Evaluation Extended Format (BEEF) Transactions
    • Simplified Payment Verification
    • Merkle Path Binary Format
    • BSV Unified Merkle Path (BUMP) Format
    • Graph Aware Sync Protocol
    • Scalable Transaction Processing in the BSV Network
    • Atomic BEEF Transactions
    • BEEF V2 Txid Only Extension
  • Scripts
    • Bitcoin Script Binary, Hex and ASM Formats
    • Bitcoin Script Assembly Language
    • Pay to Public Key Hash
    • Pay to R Puzzle Hash
    • Pay to False Return
    • Pay to True Return
    • Push TX
    • Bare Multi-Signature
    • Pay to Push Drop
  • Tokens
    • There is no BRC-20
    • Definition of UTXOs as Bitcoin Tokens
    • Token Exchange Protocol for UTXO-based Overlay Networks
    • Mandala Token Protocol
  • Overlays
    • Overlay Network Data Synchronization
    • Confederacy Host Interconnect Protocol (CHIP)
    • Overlay Network Lookup Services
    • Confederacy Lookup Availability Protocol (CLAP)
    • Universal Hash Resolution Protocol
    • Overlay Network Transaction History Tracking
    • Private Overlays with P2PKH Transactions
    • Standardized Naming Conventions for BRC-22 Topic Managers and BRC-24 Lookup Services
    • Overlay Services Synchronization Architecture
    • Diverse Facilitators and URL Protocols for SHIP and SLAP Overlay Advertisements
  • Payments
    • Direct Payment Protocol (DPP)
    • Paymail Payment Destinations
    • Simple Authenticated BSV P2PKH Payment Protocol
    • PacketPay HTTP Payment Mechanism
    • Hybrid Payment Mode for DPP
    • HTTPS Transport Mechanism for DPP
    • Paymail BEEF Transaction
    • HTTP Service Monetization Framework
  • Peer-to-Peer
    • Authrite Mutual Authentication
    • PeerServ Message Relay Interface
    • PeerServ Host Interconnect Protocol
    • Identity Certificates
    • Genealogical Identity Protocol
    • Publishing Trust Anchor Details at an Internet Domain
    • Message Signature Creation and Verification
    • Serialization Format for Portable Encrypted Messages
    • Defining a Scalable IPv6 Multicast Protocol for Blockchain Transaction Broadcast and Update Delivery
    • Proven Identity Key Exchange (PIKE)
    • Peer-to-Peer Mutual Authentication and Certificate Exchange Protocol
    • HTTP Transport for BRC-103 Mutual Authentication
  • Key Derivation
    • BIP32 Key Derivation Scheme
    • BSV Key Derivation Scheme (BKDS)
    • Security Levels, Protocol IDs, Key IDs and Counterparties
    • Admin-reserved and Prohibited Key Derivation Protocols
    • Revealing Key Linkages
    • Protecting BRC-69 Key Linkage Information in Transit
    • Mnemonic For Master Private Key
    • Linked Key Derivation Scheme
    • Bidirectionally Authenticated Derivation of Privacy Restricted Type 42 Keys
    • Limitations of BRC-69 Key Linkage Revelation
    • Verifiable Revelation of Shared Secrets Using Schnorr Protocol
  • Outpoints
    • Format for Bitcoin Outpoints
    • Spending Instructions Extension for UTXO Storage Format
  • Opinions
    • Users should never see an address
    • List of user experiences
    • Legitimate Uses for mAPI
    • Security and Scalability Benefits of UTXO-based Overlay Networks
    • Improving on MLD for BSV Multicast Services
    • Web 3.0 Standard (at a high level)
    • Thoughts on the Mandala Network
    • Outputs, Overlays, and Scripts in the Mandala Network
  • State Machines
    • Simplifying State Machine Event Chains in Bitcoin
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Abstract
  • Motivation
  • Specification
  • Risks and Limitations

Was this helpful?

Edit on GitHub
Export as PDF
  1. Scripts

Pay to True Return

Ty Everett (ty@projectbabbage.com)

Abstract

In one view of Bitcoin, only spendable output scripts with satoshis attached constitute valid Bitcoin tokens, because Bitcoin tokens are UTXOs. Since traditional BRC-18 scripts are not compatible with this view, we propose a methodology for creating OP_RETURN scripts that are spendable and contain satoshis. This provides a way for software to automatically convert non-compliant OP_RETURNs into proper Bitcoin tokens while encouraging developers to consider the spendability constraints that govern their tokens.

Motivation

Bitcoin is a token system, and as such, every output should be spendable and have value in satoshis. This fundamental principle ensures that Bitcoin remains a secure and reliable system that can be trusted by users around the world. However, traditional BRC-18 scripts, employing the OP_FALSE OP_RETURN pattern, are not compatible with this view.

OP_FALSE OP_RETURN outputs are non-spendable and carry no value, which means they cannot be considered tokens under this definition. This creates a problem for developers who want to store data on the blockchain using OP_RETURN, as it goes against the basic principles of the Bitcoin token system.

To address this issue, we propose a new methodology for creating OP_RETURN scripts that are spendable and contain satoshis. This provides a way for software to automatically convert non-compliant OP_RETURNs into proper Bitcoin tokens while encouraging developers to consider the spendability constraints that govern their tokens.

By adding the cost of one single satoshi and the fully-open spendability constraints to OP_RETURN outputs, developers will be encouraged to consider the actual constraints that govern their tokens. This will drive them towards script patterns that protect what their tokens represent and promote a more robust and secure token system for Bitcoin.

This standard offers a solution that maintains the fundamental principles of the Bitcoin token system while providing a practical way for developers to store data on the blockchain using OP_RETURN. By adopting this methodology, we can ensure that Bitcoin remains a secure and reliable system that can be trusted by users worldwide.

Specification

We specify the same script template as BRC-18, except that instead of OP_FALSE being the first opcode, it is replaced with OP_TRUE. We also stipulate that at least one satoshi must be locked in the output.

For example:

.lock
  TRUE RETURN
  <data1>
  <data2>
  <data3>

Risks and Limitations

Because BRC-18 implementers did not define the constraints under which their Bitcoin tokens would be unlocked, we have defined a fully-open system in which anyone can redeem these tokens. If implementers see this as a problem, they should consider being cognisant of the mechanisms that define the spendability constraints of their Bitcoin outputs.

PreviousPay to False ReturnNextPush TX

Last updated 1 year ago

Was this helpful?